Backport: Removal of regex usage on denom validation

mattverse commented 3 months ago

Description

Closes: #XXXX

Backports removal of regex usage on denom validation upstream

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

[ ] included the correct type prefix in the PR title
[ ] added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
[ ] targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
[ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
[ ] followed the guidelines for building modules
[ ] included the necessary unit and integration tests
[ ] added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
[ ] included comments for documenting Go code
[ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
[ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
[ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

[ ] confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
[ ] confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
[ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
[ ] reviewed state machine logic
[ ] reviewed API design and naming
[ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
[ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
[ ] manually tested (if applicable)

Summary by CodeRabbit

Refactor
- Improved handling and validation of coin denominations.
Tests
- Enhanced testing for coin denomination validation.
New Features
- Added custom parsing logic for coin denominations.
- Introduced a function to parse amount and denomination from a coin string.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 months ago

Walkthrough

The update primarily focuses on enhancing the handling and validation of coin denominations within the system. It introduces a specialized function for character validation, revamps the regular expression handling, and implements a new function for checking the validity of denomination strings. Additionally, the test suite has been expanded to include custom validation and specific denomination validation, ensuring a robust and error-free denomination handling mechanism.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
`types/coin.go`	- Refactored regex handling for denominations - Added `isValidRune` and `MatchDenom` functions - Updated and added new tests for denomination validation
`types/dec_coin.go`	- Added `unicode` package import - Modified `ParseDecCoin` for custom parsing logic - Introduced `ParseDecAmount` for parsing coin strings

🐇✨
In a burrow, deep and wide,
A rabbit worked with code-filled pride.
With each key tap, and each line neat,
Made coin denominations validate so sweet.
"Hoppity hop," it said with glee,
"For cleaner, safer code, follow me!"
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit: - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit-tests for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - The JSON schema for the configuration file is available [here](https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json). - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json` ### CodeRabbit Discord Community Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback.

czarcas7ic commented 3 months ago

Setting as draft until tests are fixed

mattverse commented 3 months ago

linting is failing but tbh idk why + im not sure if we want to create divergance with upstream just for this lint 🤔 @czarcas7ic thoughts?

ValarDragon commented 3 months ago

I agree, idc about linting

czarcas7ic commented 3 months ago

I mean, can we add an ignore line so every future PR doesnt fail

czarcas7ic commented 3 months ago

Its just saying to use switch instead of if else, should be able to add a gocritic ignore

mattverse commented 3 months ago

@czarcas7ic ok, I actually can't fix the lint (nolint is not working for some reason, also cannot replicate this lint error in my local env), I would rather fix our lint CI to something upstream sdk has, thoughts?

czarcas7ic commented 3 months ago

Yeah I am fine with any solution that keeps a lint CI check and passed

osmosis-labs / cosmos-sdk