Consider adding LBP simulation chart for LBPs

[dogemos]

Background / Problem

• LBPs follow a drastic 'start high, end low' dutch-auction-like mechanism for markets demand to be reflected in initial price discovery of tokens
• LBPs are effective when there is demand 'at a certain price', not 'at a certain time'
• Lack of understanding of the LBP mechanism can lead users to 'ape-in' early
• Mechanism between pool weight <> token price can be too difficult to understand

Solution

• Provide a more digestible graph/chart on the LBP pool details page breaking down the simulated price graph over time
• Show that 'buying the token' moves price up vs 'not buying the token' moves price down

Potential issues/ things to consider

• LBP pool on Osmosis, while not insignificant, is relatively smaller in comparison to existing pools. Don't overcomplicate, overengineer, overdesign. Need to be resource efficient with bigger priorities if needed.
• Working with the Imperator historical data may be necessary to provide non-onchain information that may need to be included in chart

Helpful resources

• Copper LBP is a good example
• Stargaze team created a LBP simulator for Cosmos

[victortokaito]

Quick sanity check: Are the 3d/4d/5d sample charts supposed to be increasing in token price?

[jhernandezb]

@victortokaito this is due to the default fake volume set in the UI ($1M) set it to 0 or a lower value (see example) and you will see the price naturally drops, will default it to 0 to avoid any confusion but the idea is that you can play with an estimation of expected volume and see how this behaves.