Closed osrf-migration closed 4 years ago
Original comment by Arthur Schang (Bitbucket: Arthur Schang).
I cannot replicate this. Just ran on my local urban_circuit
checkout catkin-built native workspace and from the published docker image osrf/subt-virtual-testbed
images and I was able to locate phone_3
in both.
Here's a screenshot from the osrf/subt-virtual-testbed
docker experiment:
Original comment by Michael Carroll (Bitbucket: Michael Carroll).
It looks like there are two different model versions in play. My version of the models have the small ramps around the tracks, and the phone_3
is located underneath the ramp.
Original comment by Arthur Schang (Bitbucket: Arthur Schang).
So I suppose the real conundrum is which version is on CloudSim?
Original comment by Steven Gray (Bitbucket: stgray).
The newest cloudsim images (cloudsim_sim_latest 75b1819471bf
tested locally using docker compose) have the ramps.
Original comment by Steven Gray (Bitbucket: stgray).
Does a missing artifact affect the qualification timeline?
Original comment by Paul Jurczak (Bitbucket: pauljurczak).
@Steven Gray My vote is to extend the deadline. I observed this issue on fresh (3 days old) Ubuntu 18.04 and SubT installation.
Original comment by Steven Gray (Bitbucket: stgray).
Paul Jurczak (pauljurczak) Couldn’t hurt to email DARPA with any specific reasons for such a request. I tried on the forums here: https://community.subtchallenge.com/t/request-extension-or-modification-of-virtual-urban-circuit-qualification-scenario/1241
Original comment by Paul Jurczak (Bitbucket: pauljurczak).
@Steven Gray I added this issue, but my posts are still moderated, so it’s going to take a while.
Original comment by Alfredo Bencomo (Bitbucket: bencomo).
Is your solution able to find and score with any of the other 15 artifacts?
Original comment by Arthur Schang (Bitbucket: Arthur Schang).
Steven and Paul, please reference Elissa Rupley's post on the SubT community forum regarding the previously outlined qualification requirements and dates remaining constant.
Original comment by Arthur Schang (Bitbucket: Arthur Schang).
I'm now able to reproduce this issue as well.
Also it seems that the illumination in the world frame does not move if you run:
ign service -s /artifact/scan --reqtype ignition.msgs.StringMsg --reptype ignition.msgs.StringMsg --timeout 1000 --req 'data: "phone_3"'
but it the illumination in the world frame does move if you use the next
functionality such as:
ign service -s /artifact/next --reqtype ignition.msgs.StringMsg --reptype ignition.msgs.StringMsg --timeout 1000 --req 'data: ""'
and then cycling through until you reach the desired artifact (i.e. phone_3
).
Interesting interaction to say the least.
Actually, running validate_artifacts.ign worldName:=urban_qual
and then immediately executing ign service -s /artifact/scan --reqtype ignition.msgs.StringMsg --reptype ignition.msgs.StringMsg --timeout 1000 --req 'data: "phone_3"'
yields my above screenshots without the ramp obstructing the cell phone. The cell phone is obstructed if you use the /artifact/next
API call.
Original comment by Michael Carroll (Bitbucket: Michael Carroll).
scan
was just to be used to iterate levels, as artifacts weren’t visible until the level was loaded. This should be resolved in the recent update to the validation tool, which should be a bit more robust in that regard: https://osrf-migration.github.io/subt-gh-pages/#!/osrf/subt/pull-requests/397 It also eliminates the need to scan
through the levels, so you can just use the next
call (or move_to
)
Original comment by Paul Jurczak (Bitbucket: pauljurczak).
@Michael What is the official way to keep SubT up to date and get changes like that available? Point me to the wiki page, if it’s current. I’m asking because I had problems to get things properly updated by following wiki suggestions.
Original comment by Paul Jurczak (Bitbucket: pauljurczak).
@Alfredo Sorry for late response, I missed you post in this long thread. Yes, I can score with other artifacts.
Original comment by Alfredo Bencomo (Bitbucket: bencomo).
Paul, Michael Carroll (Michael Carroll) ‘s changes don’t affect the SubT Sim latest release. VAT
is just an nice-to-have utility that he enhanced last week. However, it is not required to develop a solution. Therefore, you should already have the latest changes to develop and test it again the the latest SubT Sim release.
Original report (archived issue) by Paul Jurczak (Bitbucket: pauljurczak).
I’m using Artifacts_Validator_Tool and I can’t see
phone_3
inurban_qual
: