Closed JamieMagee closed 1 week ago
At a high level this looks good and matches the style in the other ones, but it's also late on a Friday. Left a few comments.
Thank you! And I completely understand.
Out of curiosity, how do file-only based checks look like on your test repo now? Such as License, and Binary-Artifacts?
They look good. Here's are a couple of examples
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Files support for the Azure DevOps client
What is the current behavior?
ListFiles
,LocalPath
, andGetFileReader
all throw an unsupported feature error.What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?**
ListFiles
,LocalPath
, andGetFileReader
have implementationsWhich issue(s) this PR fixes
Next step of #4177
Special notes for your reviewer
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
For user-facing changes, please add a concise, human-readable release note to the
release-note
(In particular, describe what changes users might need to make in their application as a result of this pull request.)