search

ossf / tac

Technical Advisory Council
https://openssf.org
Other
108 stars 53 forks source link

Alpha-Omega minor inconsistency #152

Open david-a-wheeler opened 1 year ago

david-a-wheeler commented 1 year ago

We seem to have some minor inconsistencies regarding our description of Alpha-Omega (among other things).

This slide: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ZQ7WjNH5fQL7qvpFN3jTFt-iQHqPpUc5of_azQc8iic/edit has Alpha-Omega listed as an "associated project" reporting directly to the TAC.

https://github.com/ossf/tac lists Alpha-Omega as an "affiliated project", I think that's old terminology, and it should be an "associated project".

https://github.com/ossf/alpha-omega doesn't say anything, it probably should.

This isn't world-ending, but it'd be good to have consistent terminologies.

di commented 1 year ago

Based on my reading of https://github.com/ossf/tac/issues/85, Alpha-Omega should be considered a SIF and not a "project", since "project" has a very specific definition in this context that A/O does not really fit.

SecurityCRob commented 4 months ago

I'm working with the Michaels to get this better documented and defined.

sevansdell commented 3 months ago

@SecurityCRob How's it going? How can I help?