Closed SecurityCRob closed 3 years ago
Looks like we have a pretty tight deadline to meet to nail down the scope before the OpenSSF press release.
@RedHatCRob do you think we could incorporate the remarks from @mdressman and merge?
As far as I understand, we have the consensus about the objectives themselves?
I also edited the README to match the new template, so this likely should be rebased.
On 10/8/20 8:14 AM, Marcin Hoppe wrote:
Looks like we have a pretty tight deadline to meet to nail down the scope before the OpenSSF press release.
@RedHatCRob https://github.com/RedHatCRob do you think we could incorporate the remarks from @mdressman https://github.com/mdressman and merge?
As far as I understand, we have the consensus about the objectives themselves?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ossf/wg-vulnerability-disclosures/pull/52#issuecomment-705527699, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQRFDLAKGE22XBWTEEM4UHTSJWUJXANCNFSM4R7AFSVA.
I think that is fine, yes we had agreement from the call about the objectives
-- That is the Way. I have spoken, CRob
Christopher "CRob" Robinson
Modern Renaissance Man for Red Hat Product Security
....and other duties as required
irc: CRob | tz: UTC -5:00 (US/Eastern) | email: CRob@RedHat.com
Red Hat Product Security contact: secalert@redhat.com
proposed vision/and objectives for the WG