Closed amadeann closed 6 years ago
I might completely wrong here, but didn't they recently move to python homework? I did not complete the course I did the first 10~ weeks and honestly, I liked it quite a bit. I don't have other courses to compare but not sure a metric of "speed" might be good for whether deciding if to keep it or not. There might be people that cannot breeze through the material. Also, you can do everything free in the course, homework as well? Just not get the certificate?
@giordi91 In LAFF everything except for the certificate is free. At Coursera you're quite limited in what you can do in a free version (even Jupyter Notebooks with exercises are locked).
In the current version, LAFF is back to Matlab Online. They moved away from Python, since people had problems setting it up.
The metric of speed is not good, I know - some people need more basics. But if you already had some Math at the university (my case - I did Economics), going through 5 slow-paced Math courses in the curriculum is no the best use of time.
Hi @amadeann, please see #418. Some actually find LAFF to be difficult, which is why we ended up adding "Essence of linear algebra" right before it. I think you are more of an outlier since you have a very strong math background. I am not surprised that you find it too easy given that you already took a linear algebra course. If you want to check if your knowledge has any gaps, check Strang's lectures. Hope this helps!
I decided to "drop out" of LAFF course, and keep working through a book on applied linear algebra. That book is pretty "shallow" (i.e. doesn't elaborate too much on each topic), but has quite a lot of challenging (and interesting) exercises. I find it more convenient to do my own research on the topics that I don't understand (occasionally asking for help on Math Stack Exchange), rather than sitting through the video lectures.
My plan is to do all the exercises in that book, follow along with the companion on linear algebra in Julia, and then breeze through the Strang's Linear Algebra book.
Hi, really worth it! I couldn't finish it but I done it up to de first exam. The pace is slow but I think is made that way to build solid foundations. Everything is directed to build the central idea of linear transformation and it's relation to everything else, I think it has a very sound aprouch. Also I found the programming topics very interesting, especialy to practice how to traverse and work with matrices.
ارجوكم لا ترسلون أي شيء
أنا لست من ضمن مجموعتكم وهذه الإيميلات تأتيني بالخطأ
أُرسلت من الـ iPhone
في 11/12/2019 الساعة 6:22 م، كتب/كتبت Ignacio Caamaño notifications@github.com:
Hi, really worth it! I couldn't finish it but I done it up to de first exam. The pace is slow but I think is made that way to build solid foundations. Everything is directed to build the central idea of linear transformation and it's relation to everything else, I think it has a very sound aprouch. Also I found the programming topics very interesting, especialy to practice how to traverse and work with matrices.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ossu/computer-science/issues/507?email_source=notifications&email_token=ANMP2IL3DN3KLHAL25M2AL3QYEAULA5CNFSM4FVPSAAKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEGTP67Y#issuecomment-564592511, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANMP2IKPGT72MAYCIRVOKT3QYEAULANCNFSM4FVPSAAA.
https://www.edx.org/course/linear-algebra-foundations-to-frontiers
I'm currently at week 2 of this course and find it not challenging at all. Looking at the syllabus, the course is very slow paced. I've recently completed Mathematics for Machine Learning: Linear Algebra, without 'paid' parts, and it seems like the curriculum mostly overlaps. Only that I was able to be done with the Coursera course in less than a month, without much difficulties.
Matlab part in LAFF seems to be not too useful (at least for our purposes) - based on the comments from the instructors, they're using it because it's easy to set up, and they got free support from Matlab consultants (it's true, I've already got answers to a couple of questions from the consultants). But the way they write Matlab code, it trying to resemble C, and Fortran. Here's a comment from the instructor (emphasis mine):
and:
We already have a few courses in the curriculum with DSL (How To Code, and Nand2Tetries are ones I'm 100% sure about). At some point computer science students should start programing in languages used in the industry, not learning one DSL afer anothter.
A huge upside of this course is that both instructors are extremely active on the discussion groups - I've never seen anything like that in any MOOC. Most of the time they seem to be answering the questions on the same day you ask them.
I know it's a bit early to judge course after 1.5 weeks, but I am not really sure if I should invest 12 weeks into this course, if the material can be covered in 3-4 weeks. Can anyone who actually completed the course give their thoughts on whether it is worth keeping it in the curriculum? Should we replace it with something shorter, more fast-paced, and using a language like Python, or R (or even Matlab, but written in a Matlab way, without mimicking C or Fortran)? Or maybe suggest LAFF as an optional course for students who need more time for math (e.g. someone that is coming to Computer Science from Humanities, and not, Finance, Economics or Engineering)?