Open pandayummy opened 2 months ago
Is this tool specifically designed for flux?
i think yes
But SDXL much faster than Flux, it will be there with Flux for several years.
But SDXL much faster than Flux, it will be there with Flux for several years.
I've used and can recommend the OneTrainer project for SDXL whole model fine-tunes and LoRas. But Flux is next-level in quality. If you're interested in faster Flux gens, try Flux Schnell. Good results in 4 steps, but experimental.
I tried to change the configurations for SDXL and was not able to match the quality of the lora training that I was getting with AutoTrain Advanced. I suspect there are subtle differences between how the training loop is implemented here compared to DreamBooth from AutoTrain. So, I made a library (lorakit) to follow a configuration similar to this one to train SDXL lora. lorakit
I tried to change the configurations for SDXL and was not able to match the quality of the lora training that I was getting with AutoTrain Advanced. I suspect there are subtle differences between how the training loop is implemented here compared to DreamBooth from AutoTrain. So, I made a library (lorakit) to follow a configuration similar to this one to train SDXL lora. lorakit
Could u pls put some images of the UI in your repo?
@pandayummy lorakit does not have a UI (at least not yet). It has a configuration file that you edit. Then you call lorakit through command line interface and pass that configuration for the training to start. Sampled images during the training will be written in the output folder.
Is this tool specifically designed for flux?