Closed rzr closed 7 years ago
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
LGTM.
Some modifications are needed in the Reference Kit [1] image configuration with this change, but those changes can be done when we update this repo as submodule in the Reference Kit.
@rzr The naming is better this way, but the suggested usage isn't going to work particularly well. It has ordering issues (sub-layer must come after base layer) and there are plenty of layers which do not follow this particular naming convention.
The solution chosen in bitbake master is BBFILES_DYNAMIC. Feel free to submit a backport patch for older releases.
Hi @pohly , that would help to get it merged, I am ready to help if there is any side effect too
Is it ok to keep this repo synced with intel/iot-web-layers at least until a new release of iotivity-node (2.x?) lands into it ?
@rzr hi, I just merged this PR.
I do not have plans to test and maintain this repo in the future, so I recommend to switch to new one ASAP.
Rename layer name to "iot-web from "iotweb", to be used in collections.
This way this layer can be optionally and dynamicaly overloaded by sub layer, using this scriplet:
BBFILES += "${@' '.join('${LAYERDIR}/meta-%s/recipes//*.bb' % layer \ for layer in BBFILE_COLLECTIONS.split())}"
Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval philippe.coval@osg.samsung.com