Rating display order on new work creation not logical

otwstephanie / otwarchive3

Clone of OTWarchive, for merge testing

0 stars 0 forks source link

Rating display order on new work creation not logical #360

Closed otwstephanie closed 10 years ago

otwstephanie commented 10 years ago

From bookk...@gmail.com on September 13, 2008 12:25:23

What archive revision are you testing on? (See the revision number next to "An Archive Of Our Own: Extreme Alpha (rev. #)" in the header).

Rev. #677 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Begin creating a new work while logged in

Use drop-down "Rating" menu What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I expect the ratings to be in order, either from tamest to hard-core, or from hard-core to tamest (with perhaps the initial/default setting "Not Rated"). So... Not Rated, General Audiences, Teen and Up Audiences, Mature, Explicit... would be the way I'd do it.

Instead, I see an Alphabetical listing of the rating choices. (Explicit, General Audiences, Mature, Not Rated, Teen and Up Audiences) Which really, really is not the way to go. Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/otwarchive/issues/detail?id=360

otwstephanie commented 10 years ago

From elz...@gmail.com on September 14, 2008 09:36:12

Should be fixed now.

Status: FixedButUnverified
Owner: elzj78
Labels: Component-UI roadmap-tag Milestone-Beta

otwstephanie commented 10 years ago

From bookk...@gmail.com on September 14, 2008 12:20:43

Issue appears to be fixed as of r687 . Thanks! :D

otwstephanie commented 10 years ago

From vohw...@gmail.com on September 15, 2008 05:14:59

Wouldn't it be better though to make 'not rated' the default, followed by 'General Audience, Teen, Mature, Explicit'? Right now 'General Audience' is the default.

otwstephanie commented 10 years ago

From elz...@gmail.com on September 15, 2008 05:38:06

Not rated is the default on the beta site - our options for displaying them (easily) are 1. alphabetical or 2. in the order they were created. I tried to add things in a logical order over there, but we hadn't gotten the final ToS yet, and the select display issue hadn't really come up, when I was adding them to the testarchive, and I'm not sure it's worth deleting and re-creating them all.

otwstephanie commented 10 years ago

From vohw...@gmail.com on September 15, 2008 14:58:28

Oh, okay. So if I understand it right, the order over at the beta site is already the correct one? I'm marking this one as verified then.

Status: FixedAndVerified

otwstephanie commented 10 years ago

From Black0Sa...@gmail.com on February 24, 2009 17:43:44

Updating status options

Status: DeployedToBeta

otwstephanie commented 10 years ago

From Black0Sa...@gmail.com on February 24, 2009 19:22:50

Updating status on discussion with Jennifew and Sidra

Status: VerifiedOnBeta

otwstephanie commented 10 years ago

From autu...@gmail.com on November 13, 2010 14:13:05

listing all former issues for automated tests

Status: NeedsTests

otwstephanie commented 10 years ago

From autu...@gmail.com on November 14, 2010 11:40:28

Converting from NeedsTest status to NeedsTest label

Status: VerifiedOnBeta
Labels: NeedsTests