ourresearch / journalsdb

Open database of scholarly journals
https://journalsdb.org
MIT License
10 stars 0 forks source link

Questions about some ISSN's related to Sage #32

Closed sckott closed 2 years ago

sckott commented 2 years ago

Hi Casey, Looking at some titles supposedly published with Sage, given to me by one of our library consortia. A few questions/comments. Sorry the below is a bit messy :)

The goal here is for me to understand why certain titles are excluded from Unsub dashboards, reasons include: moved to Gold OA, not currently publishing, price not available, or new publisher. In particular the following is in relation to the new publisher category.

Here's a spreadsheet of the ISSN's excluded from a few Unsub dashboards. If there's an entry in the notes column I manually went to the website for the journal to inspect it.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10Dw2MRkXzATua4fZh9EzXCY78TU6TioJ8ZG_KbGOK2E/edit#gid=0

In the "notes" column of the above spreadsheet I have the following categories:

There's a column "crossref/journalsdb differ" that says whether publisher name differs in JournalsDB vs. Crossref

Note on Libertas Academica - Sage acquired this publisher back in 2016 https://sustainingknowledgecommons.org/category/publisher/libertas-academica/ Many of these titles are gold OA anyway, so would be excluded form Unsub dashboards due to that reason, so publisher isn't important, but publisher is important if the title is not Gold OA

caseydm commented 2 years ago

Hi @sckott I went through the spreadsheet and fixed all of the journals that I thought she be fixed. I added a column so you can see what changed.

We have an imprint field in the database, but so far we have not exposed that through the API. We always assigned the "higher level" publisher to the publisher field in the API. So based on that I changed all of the libertas and AEAU to SAGE. I set the imprint appropriately in the database.

Take a look and let me know if you want anything else changed!

sckott commented 2 years ago

Thanks!

caseydm commented 2 years ago

Those are fixed now!

sckott commented 2 years ago

thank you 👍🏽

sckott commented 2 years ago

@caseydm

caseydm commented 2 years ago

@sckott My replies are below.

Done!

The problem with this one is that 2631-3103 should fall under the ISSN-L 2631-309X, which does have dois by year. So I went ahead and moved that ISSN under it as it should be.

  • Looks like ISSN 1539-6053 is correctly mapped on to https://api.journalsdb.org/journals/1529-1006, but on my end I have a separate row in the database for ISSN 1539-6053 - whereas I'd expect just a row for ISSN 1529-1006. I don't see a row for ISSN 2160-0031, so that's good. Maybe delete row for ISSN 1539-6053?

I don't see an issue with this one. All of the relevant ISSNs appear to mapped together for the journal. Are you saying the ISSNs should point to separate journals? Because when I go to the journal web site I can see that 1539-6053 and 1529-1006 are linked together: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/psi. And apparently 2160-0031 is an older ISSN reference to that same journal. Let me know!

sckott commented 2 years ago

Thanks for those two fixes!

For the 3rd item: On our end, we do issn to issn-l mapping as you know. Looking at the table we use derived from JournalsDB

select * from some_table where issn_l in ('1539-6053', '1529-1006', '2160-0031');

which results in

issn_l publisher title issn
1539-6053 SAGE Psychological science in the public interest 1539-6053
1529-1006 SAGE Psychological science in the public interest 2160-0031
1529-1006 SAGE Psychological science in the public interest 1539-6053
1529-1006 SAGE Psychological science in the public interest 1529-1006

This table is essentially spreads each linking ISSN across X rows, where X is how many ISSNs map to that linking ISSN. Then we use the table to map ISSN to linking ISSN.

So if a Unsub user uploads a counter file with the ISSN 1539-6053 then we'll map it to the linking ISSN 1539-6053, which is not correct. It should map to linking ISSN 1529-1006.

We have that Xplenty job that moves data from journalsdb to the Unsub database, so perhaps it's something in there we need to fix? I'm not sure yet. Let me know if you have any ideas

sckott commented 2 years ago

One more - this one https://api.journalsdb.org/journals/2752-7646 should be SAGE - also, dois by year only has 2021 DOIs, but that's the case for Crossref as well. Any way to fix this?

caseydm commented 2 years ago

For the dois by year, @richard-orr will have to help with that. As far as I know we pull from crossref and if crossref does not have more data then I'm not sure what we do.

With ISSN 1539-6053, I think it is an issue with xplenty, or maybe something that needs to be resolved manually. It was probably wrong in journalsdb a while ago, but got corrected at some point. But that update didn't make it through xplenty and into your database properly. Everywhere I look in journalsdb, that ISSN is mapped to 1529-1006 like it should be.

I updated that last journal to SAGE so the publisher is correct.

sckott commented 2 years ago

Thanks Casey. I'll look into the 1539-6053 issue (xplenty, etc.)

@richard-orr thx in advance for looking into dois_by_issued_year for https://api.journalsdb.org/journals/2752-7646 - the only legitimate reason I can think of the missing DOIs is perhaps they changed ISSN between 2020 and 2021

richard-orr commented 2 years ago

@sckott I think you're right; the journal rebranded and changed ISSNs: https://nafme.org/welcome-newly-rebranded-journal-general-music-education/

Articles from before 2021 like https://api.crossref.org/v1/works/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1048371319834921 have the old ISSN and are counted here: https://api.journalsdb.org/journals/1048-3713

sckott commented 2 years ago

thanks @richard-orr ! I guess I could have googled that 😊

sckott commented 2 years ago

one more:

caseydm commented 2 years ago

one more:

This is fixed. I searched and found 402 journals had that same pattern with a ":" at the end. So I went ahead and fixed all of them.

I guess we need to merge these together right? https://api.journalsdb.org/journals/2752-7646 https://api.journalsdb.org/journals/1048-3713

sckott commented 2 years ago

Thanks for fixing that one and all those other 400ish!

I guess we need to merge these together right?

I would think so? I don't know if you have a way you deal with this already? Just thinking logically it makes sense to merge b/c a reader or a subscriber of the old title and ISSN isn't going to suddenly not read or subscribe b/c of the title or ISSN change, so its really the same journal still

caseydm commented 2 years ago

Ok those two journals are merged together. https://api.journalsdb.org/journals/2752-7646

It may take a day or two for the DOI counts to be updated properly.

sckott commented 2 years ago

thanks!