Closed th2ch-g closed 1 year ago
Hi th,
LTR_retriever identifies intact LTR elements and constructs a non-redundant library to annotated fragmented LTR sequences. By saying much shorter length, did you mean intact only or both intact and fragmented LTR sequences?
Shujun
Dear, oushujun.
Thank you for replying.
I meant intact LTR only. I think that is why LTR annotated by LTR_retriever is much shorter.
By the way, I calculated annotated LTR from
Sincerely, th
Hello th,
LTR_retriever annotates whole-genome LTR sequences (intact and fragmented), which could be found in the .out.gff
file. The .pass.list
file only contains intact LTR elements. The .out(RepeatMasker output file) should contain all LTR sequences (intact and fragmented). So you should compare the LTR_retriever .out.gff
file with the RepeatMasker .out
file.
Best, Shujun
Dear, oushujun
Thank you for creating a great tool.
This issue is question, not bug.
My question is that total length of LTRs annotated by RepeatModeler(with -LTRStruct) and RepeatMasker is much longer than the total length of LTRs annotated by LTR_retriever.
Is this happening because LTR_re only annotates intact LTRs ?
Sincerely, th