Closed xiaenhua closed 4 years ago
Dear Enhua,
I forgot if I have replied to your question or not. Sorry if I missed it. LTR_retriever identifies intact LTR retrotransposons, which usually a small fraction of all LTR sequences (intact, solo LTR, truncated, fragmented, remnants, LTR-like...) that are annotated by RepeatMasker. The two datasets represent different aspects of a genome and using which depends on your analysis. Hope this helps!
Best, Shujun
Dear Shujun, Thanks for developing LTR_retriever. I used LTR_retriever to annotate a subset sequences of a plant genome and found 2333 intact LTR-RTs. This number is much less than that annotated by RepeatMasker (approximate 11743 ) with non-redundant LTR-RTs reported by LTR_retriever. How to explain such differences? Which datasets should I use for downstream analysis? BTW, I only focus on the evolution of LTR-RTs.
With kind regards,
Enhua