mssql.connect generates error "socket must be an instance of net.Socket" / `node:tls` does not accept a custom stream for it's `.socket` param

[dmcquay]

What version of Bun is running?

1.0.1+31aec4ebe325982fc0ef27498984b0ad9969162b

What platform is your computer?

Darwin 21.6.0 x86_64 i386

What steps can reproduce the bug?

bun init -y
bun add mssql

Create a file named index.js with the following contents:

import * as sql from 'mssql'

const main = async () => {
    await sql.connect({
        user: 'bogus',
        password: 'bogus',
        database: 'bogus',
        server: 'example.database.windows.net'
    })
}

main()

You can literally use that example server to reproduce. No need to set up your own SQL Server.

What is the expected behavior?

Connection error because the user/password is wrong:

ConnectionError: Cannot open server 'example' requested by the login. Client with IP address '136.38.114.139' is not allowed to access the server...

I am checking this by running the same file with node 20.5.0.

Of course in my real code, I can also connect to my server successfully, but I don't want to share my DB host publicly, so this was a more minimal reproduction I could share.

What do you see instead?

ConnectionError: Failed to connect to example.database.windows.net:1433 - socket must be an instance of net.Socket code: "ESOCKET"

Additional information

I think the error is thrown here: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/4c113d1866ef6463a5972d90a2b6bddceb56ef73/src/js/node/net.js#L437

But I haven't been able to figure out what line in mssql lib is triggering this.

[petterbergman]

Also reproduced on bun 1.0.2 with correct user name and password, thus making it impossible to use bun with mssql.

[aliiadev]

same issue :((

[jeremyd4500]

Same issue here connecting to Azure SQL Server with sequelize.

[andresverjan]

Same issue here connecting to Azure SQL Server with sequelize !!!

[ianzepp]

Same error. Can connect to the Azure service just fine from the same local machine with Visual Code + the SQL server plugin. Firewall rules allow access. Bun + Knex fails to connect with the same config/env vars and throws a ESOCKET error with message socket must be an instance of net.Socket.

[cgslivre]

I had the same problem, it was not possible to connect to the SQL SERVER.

After updating to Bun 1.0.6, it apparently worked!

I'll do some more testing but it's possible that the team has already fixed the lack of net.Socket implementation.

Steps:

bun init . # confirm, confirm ...
bun add mssql
bun add knex

./index.ts

import knex from "knex";

const db = knex({
    client: "mssql",
    connection: {
        host: Bun.env["DB_DEV_HOST"],
        port: parseInt(Bun.env["DB_DEV_PORT"] || "1433"),
        user: Bun.env["DB_USER"],
        password: Bun.env["DB_PASS"],
        database: Bun.env["DB_DATABASE"],
    },
});

console.log(await db.table("example_table").first());

./package.json

{
    "name": "bot-bun",
    "module": "index.ts",
    "type": "module",
    "devDependencies": {
        "bun-types": "latest"
    },
    "peerDependencies": {
        "typescript": "^5.0.0"
    },
    "dependencies": {
        "knex": "^3.0.1",
        "mssql": "^10.0.1"
    }
}

Result:

[mscoobby]

It is still an issue with bun 1.0.11 Anyone found a fix?

[cgslivre]

It is still an issue with bun 1.0.11 Anyone found a fix?

I tested it on 1.0.6 and it was OK.

I updated yesterday to 1.0.11, ran the test again, and it still seems OK!

[mscoobby]

That is very strange, I am using sequelize and I am still getting the error.

package.json

{
  "name": "bun-sequelize",
  "module": "index.ts",
  "type": "module",
  "devDependencies": {
    "bun-types": "latest"
  },
  "peerDependencies": {
    "typescript": "^5.0.0"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "sequelize": "^6.35.0",
    "tedious": "^16.6.0"
  }
}

index.ts

import { Sequelize } from 'sequelize'

const sequelize = new Sequelize('', '--', '--', {
    port: 1450,
    dialect: 'mssql',
})

try {
    await sequelize.authenticate();
    console.log('Connection has been established successfully.');
} catch (error) {
    throw new Error(`Unable to connect to the database: ${error}`)
}

Result:

The database is running in Docker and its 1433 port is exposed on 1450

And the exact same file but executed with node:

[Angelelz]

Same error in macOS sonoma. Everything works properly in node

[EthanTuning]

I am on Bun v1.0.20, and I am also getting this error when trying to connect to a MS SQL Server database using mssql. I also tried to connect with sequelize and same thing.

This seems to me to be a pretty big deal. Having no ability to connect to databases from a runtime that's suppose to run on servers, one of the most common things you would ever do on a server.

Is there possibly some other configuration needed to get this working?

[ReeceXW]

Can we get an update on this, how can bun be viable without even basic sql driver support?

[Electroid]

It looks like the issue is that our version of tls.connect assumes that the socket must be a Socket, where indeed it is possible for it to be a Duplex.

socket Establish secure connection on a given socket rather than creating a new socket. Typically, this is an instance of net.Socket, but any Duplex stream is allowed.

[paperdave]

dependency-free reproduction

import { connect } from 'node:tls';
import { Duplex } from 'node:stream';

let socket;
class DuplexSocket extends Duplex {
  constructor(options) {
    super(options);
  }
  _read() {
        console.log('pass');
        socket.destroy();
  }
  _write(chunk, encoding, callback) {
  }
  _final(callback) {
  }
}

socket = connect({
  host: "127.0.0.1",
  port: 1433,
  localAddress: undefined,
  family: 4,
    socket: new DuplexSocket()
});
const onError = err => {
    console.log('e', err);
};
const onConnect = () => {};
socket.on('error', onError);
socket.on('connect', onConnect);

[paperdave]

DuplexSocket is not

• a socket
• bun's socket

this is defined in the node.js documentation and we should implement it.

[Angelelz]

We need to connect to a sqlserver database using node-mssql, it would be really good to be able to use bun at work. Please keep up the good work

[mvandervliet]

I recently came across this exact scenario and tried a number of things. Initially I tried just using mssql directly (without sequelize or knex), and got the same errors.

I suspected it might be a bun version thing, or a mssql version thing and tried multiple variations without success.

Then, upgrading to latest packages AND wrapping with knex solved for me:

• bun: 1.0.26
• mssql: 10.0.2
• knex: 3.1.0

[JocularMarrow]

Same issue on our side,

• bun: 1.0.26
• mssql: 10.0.2

We have an existing project we wanna migrate to bun. But this issue makes it completely impossible, reworking our full code base to use knex or maybe try prisma will take to long.

Developers needs to look into this issue... This really makes bun in my eyes useless. Databases are somewhat important.

[SamMorey]

I am also getting blocked by this issue:

• bun: 1.0.30
• sequelize: 6.37.1
• tedious: 17.0.0
• knex: 3.1.0

Seconding @mvandervliet that Knex functions. We have an older project that we don't want to convert, so being able to use sequelize and tedious out of the box would be much nicer.

[yurisanp]

Same issue here

bun: 1.0.35 typeorm: 0.3.20 mssql: 10.0.2

I need a fix for this issue to continue migrating to Bun.

[anilcan-kara]

Still exists

Bun: 1.1.6 mssql: 10.0.2

[pashaie]

Still exists

Bun: 1.1.17 with tedious: 18.2.1 or mssql: 11.0.0

import sql from 'mssql';

try {
    await sql.connect('Server=.;Database=kysely_rnd;Trusted_Connection=True;Encrypt=true')
    const result = await sql.query`select * from kysely_rnd `
    console.dir(result)
} catch (err) {
    console.log(err)
}

Error:

bun .\src\mssql.ts

80 |         rejectOnce(err)
81 |         return
82 |       }
83 |       tedious.connect(err => {
84 |         if (err) {
85 |           err = new ConnectionError(err)
                     ^
ConnectionError: Failed to connect to localhost:1433 - socket must be an instance of net.Socket
 code: "ESOCKET"

      at with-db\node_modules\mssql\lib\tedious\connection-pool.js:85:17
      at onConnect (with-db\node_modules\tedious\lib\connection.js:1337:7)
      at native:1:1
      at emit (native:1:1)
      at socketError (with-db\node_modules\tedious\lib\connection.js:2133:7)
      at with-db\node_modules\tedious\lib\connection.js:2238:25
      at processTicksAndRejections (native:1:1)

[gjovanov]

Is there any roadmap on when will this be prioritized?

The reality is that mssql is still widely used among corp clients and it really is pity that we cannot use bun (on win) to connect a mssql DB, given that bun is a such a great tool and makes life easier in so many other areas.

It would be great to at least get an information on if it's planned to be addressed any soon or it's treated a low prio thing. Thanks.

[simonechiarlo]

same issue here, also interested in knowing if is there any roadmap taking this (very blocking) issue in consideration

[arvanti]

same here, this is a showstoper for us.
any updates on this?

[itorica]

Unsecure workaround:

bun: 1.1.18 tedious: 18.2.4

I'm running SQL Server 2022 on localhost (on Linux) and I can do without TLS encryption. So I disabled ForceEncryption on the server:

/opt/mssql/bin/mssql-conf set network.forceencryption 0
systemctl restart mssql-server.service

Then you need to disable client encryption in the tedious connection config (encrypt: false):

import { config } from './config'
import { Request, TYPES, Connection } from 'tedious';
const mssqlconfig = {
    server: config.server, //localhost
    port: config.port,
    options: {
        encrypt: false,
        database: config.database,
    },
    authentication: {
        type: "default",
        options: {
            userName: config.user,
            password: config.pass,
        }
    }
};
var connection = new Connection(mssqlconfig);
...

That worked for me. Of course this is not recommended over remote connections.

[stgoerlitz]

I have the same issue in Bun 1.1.20.

Still exists

Bun: 1.1.17 with tedious: 18.2.1 or mssql: 11.0.0

import sql from 'mssql';

try {
    await sql.connect('Server=.;Database=kysely_rnd;Trusted_Connection=True;Encrypt=true')
    const result = await sql.query`select * from kysely_rnd `
    console.dir(result)
} catch (err) {
    console.log(err)
}

Error:

bun .\src\mssql.ts

80 |         rejectOnce(err)
81 |         return
82 |       }
83 |       tedious.connect(err => {
84 |         if (err) {
85 |           err = new ConnectionError(err)
                     ^
ConnectionError: Failed to connect to localhost:1433 - socket must be an instance of net.Socket
 code: "ESOCKET"

      at with-db\node_modules\mssql\lib\tedious\connection-pool.js:85:17
      at onConnect (with-db\node_modules\tedious\lib\connection.js:1337:7)
      at native:1:1
      at emit (native:1:1)
      at socketError (with-db\node_modules\tedious\lib\connection.js:2133:7)
      at with-db\node_modules\tedious\lib\connection.js:2238:25
      at processTicksAndRejections (native:1:1)

is this PR going to fix it? https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/12750 it seems quite far along and I would just wait for that fix before trying a workaround or nodejs

[mpanichella]

Any updates on this error? I tested it again in version 1.1.21, and the issue still persists. It's a shame because it's a product with a lot of potential, but without resolving these kinds of errors, using Bun loses its purpose.

[synelokk]

maybe you can try for update database config options : { encrypt: false } , but i think is not secure for remote connections

[simonechiarlo]

maybe you can try for update database config options : { encrypt: false } , but i think is not secure for remote connections

Not only it makes it less secure, but also it's completely unacceptable for azure, as it prevents you from editing the encryption settings on the db, enforcing encryption.

[Necrelox]

I hope that one day this will be resolved 😭

[Jarred-Sumner]

@Necrelox the day has come.

The fix for this will be part of Bun v1.1.27, which ships in about an hour

[Necrelox]

@Jarred-Sumner Wow, I'm so happy !

Thank you so much !!!!