I've seen that in the issue maybe you wanted to make something more advanced, using the compiler pass because the regex will not be sufficient anymore. But with the regex, it would actually fail if you do not specify a valid service name. Maybe you really don't want at the moment to use regex, but I've wanted to submit this PR anyway to see if you will be okay to use that regex in the meantime. I don't know enough how works the compiler pass so I could not try to make something more advanced, but I'll totally understand if you don't want to support FQCN services names with a simple regex ! 👍
Related issue
14
I've seen that in the issue maybe you wanted to make something more advanced, using the compiler pass because the regex will not be sufficient anymore. But with the regex, it would actually fail if you do not specify a valid service name. Maybe you really don't want at the moment to use regex, but I've wanted to submit this PR anyway to see if you will be okay to use that regex in the meantime. I don't know enough how works the compiler pass so I could not try to make something more advanced, but I'll totally understand if you don't want to support FQCN services names with a simple regex ! 👍