Closed kdmccormick closed 1 month ago
Yes, that makes sense, but can I suggest a different url? /authoring
is not a very conventional path. It's very "English". Should we redirect to /studio
or /cms
instead?
I don't have a very strong opinion on this, it's mostly a gut feeling. What do you think?
As a dev, it's nice that the URL names map exactly to the repo names, so /authoring
is my top choice (too bad you didn't suggest frontend-app-studio for the name up the upstream repo :)
As someone who speaks only American English, /authoring
and /studio
both sound equally good to me. But I take your word that the latter may sound better to a global audience, so I am totally fine if you'd like to go with that.
My only strong opinion is that I don't like /cms
. If you don't know what CMS stands for, it's meaningless. Even if you do know what CMS stands for, then you'd probably think about Wordpress or Drupal before you think of something like Studio. The only reason we still call it CMS at all is because it's baked into so many parts of the codebase.
I'm definitely over-thinking this, thanks for indulging me. Let's go with /authoring.
Fix just got merged.
frontend-app-course-authoring was renamed to frontend-app-authoring: https://github.com/openedx/frontend-app-authoring/pull/1289
At a minimum, we should update the URLs here.
Should we rename the app as well? It would be a breaking change for plugin authors.
If so, can we add a
/course-authoring/*
->/authoring/*
redirect to caddy to avoid breaking links?