Closed drmuey closed 4 years ago
As stated on the documentation both modsecurity_rules_file and modsecurity_rules should work. What is not yet supported is the usage of SecRuleEngine Off'
as an Apache configuration as used to be on 2.x.
As stated on the documentation both modsecurity_rules_file and modsecurity_rules should work.
Thanks that is what I thought but the comment made it sound like only modsecurity_rules_file
, thank you for clarifying!
What is not yet supported is the usage of
SecRuleEngine Off'
as an Apache configuration as used to be on 2.x.
Thanks, that prompted more questions when you get a minute:
modsecurity_rules 'SecRuleEngine Off'
is not supported by the Apache connector or just reiterating that SecRuleEngine Off
by itself like in 2.x won’t work?SecRuleEngine Off
by itself like in 2.x will work for the Apache connector?
modsecurity
, modsecurity_rules
, modsecurity_rules_file
, et al continue to work?Sorry for the questions, just trying to plan for the future, especially when some of the stuff that needs to know this is not part of an RPM that can be updated and sent out but rather code that gets updated and released every 3 months and we have to factor in things like long term support versions that need to function.
Really appreciate it @zimmerle ;)
Update: moved question to #75
In #73 you made this comment:
Are you saying that only
modsecurity_rules_file
works and somodsecurity_rules 'SecRuleEngine Off'
is not valid for apache and/or nginx connectors?Thanks for the clarification 👍