Closed ifraixedes closed 9 years ago
I'm wondering why isn't it appropriated to develop a library?
Sorry for the confusion on the README
. I didn't have enough time to explain everything at the 48 hours Gopher Gala :wink:. It's not impossible to support this feature in nut
. However, my original goal was to solve the number one pain point when developing a binary problem like hub: locking vendored dependencies and easy update of locked vendored dependencies. Besides, I haven't thought through what would be the best way to accomplish vendoring a library without causing problems when this library is vendored in a binary program. For example, assuming both a library and a binary program vendor dependencies:
- a_library:
- vendor
- _nuts
...
- binary_program:
- vendor
- _nuts
...
When we run nut install
in binary_program
, do we copy all dependencies in a_library/vendor/_nuts
to the binary_program
? What if there're dependencies defined in binary_program
conflicting with what are in a_library
? However, I do really want to support vendoring dependencies for a library. It's just a matter of time to iron this out.
Isn't it possible to update the commit SHA in Godeps.json, then delete Godeps/_workspace directory and run godep save again?
I wasn't aware I could do that...But it looks very cucumber-some. This also comes with my another frustration: all the Go dependency manager tools out there are not as straightforward and not as familiar. I really wish it could be as simple as nut update FOO
and the job is done. nut
is trying to fill this gap.
Hope that helps.
Sorry for the confusion on the README. I didn't have enough time to explain everything at the 48 hours Gopher Gala :wink:
Sure, it is totally understandable.
Thanks for your reply, it is really helpful to know about your experience.
I wasn't aware I could do that...But it looks very cucumber-some. This also comes with my another frustration: all the Go dependency manager tools out there are not as straightforward and not as familiar. I really wish it could be as simple as nut update FOO and the job is done. nut is trying to fill this gap.
I know that you mean, automatisation is keen but it must work, at least if it could work for binaries with no pain, then it's a good progress.
Many thanks for your time.
Hi,
Thanks for this awesome hack. I would like to ask you a couple of question that I'm in doubt, sorry I'm not much experienced in Go and maybe they are silly questions, however I've taken a look before asking and I couldn't get the answers, but they are very valuable for me as I could learn from your experience for a professional use.
nut is specifically designed to manage dependencies for a binary program. If you are making a library, please follow the standard Go way.
After this comment, I'm wondering why isn't it appropriated to develop a library?
However, godep doesn't allow updating any dependency with rewritten import paths
What do you mean? Isn't it possible to update the commit SHA in
Godeps.json
, then deleteGodeps/_workspace
directory and rungodep save
again?Is
Nut.toml
the difference with mjibson/party?Many thanks in advance.