Closed jvoigtlaender closed 1 year ago
Side note: The line numbering from the compiler message seems off, given that the example code with line numbers was as follows.
Also, maybe it is worth adding something like
(\\) :: ValueSet Integer -> ValueSet Integer -> ValueSet Integer
or
delete :: Integer -> ValueSet Integer -> ValueSet Integer
to the API?
(Names above are from the list API, there might be better ones.)
there are now functions
with :: ValuesSet Integer -> Integer -> ValueSet Integer
without :: ValuesSet Integer -> Integer -> ValueSet Integer
(\\) :: ValueSet Integer -> ValueSet Integer -> ValueSet Integer
as well as functions for the basic constructors. (constructors are now hidden)
I wanted to try out how the "product overflow" example behaves when the SMT solver is forbidden to choose
0
as one of the factors.But I couldn't do this:
because of: