owid / etl

A compute graph for loading and transforming OWID's data
https://docs.owid.io/projects/etl
MIT License
58 stars 18 forks source link

:lipstick: Restrict Equaldex and Mignot data to sovereign countries #2833

Closed paarriagadap closed 1 week ago

paarriagadap commented 2 weeks ago

Main issue https://github.com/owid/owid-issues/issues/1556

owidbot commented 2 weeks ago
Quick links (staging server): Site Admin Wizard

Login: ssh owid@staging-site-equaldex-restrict-data-to-sovereign

chart-diff: ✅
  • 18/18 reviewed charts
    • Modified: 17/17
    • New: 1/1
data-diff: ❌ Found differences ```diff = Dataset garden/ivs/2023-11-27/integrated_values_survey = Table integrated_values_survey - - Column agree_agg_homosx_prnts - - Column agree_homosx_prnts - - Column disagree_agg_homosx_prnts - - Column disagree_homosx_prnts ~ Column dont_know_abortion (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Abortion". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Abortion". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_accepting_a_bribe (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Accepting a bribe in the course of their duties". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Accepting a bribe in the course of their duties". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_avoiding_fare_on_public_transport (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Avoiding a fare on public transport". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Avoiding a fare on public transport". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_behave (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person to always behave properly". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person to always behave properly". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_cheating_on_taxes (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Cheating on taxes". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Cheating on taxes". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_civil_war (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "To what degree are you worried about the following situations?", when the situation was "A civil war". ? ^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "To what degree are you worried about the following situations?", when the situation was "A civil war". ? ^ ~ Column dont_know_claiming_benefits (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Claiming government benefits to which you are not entitled". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Claiming government benefits to which you are not entitled". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_death_penalty (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Death penalty". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Death penalty". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_divorce (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Divorce". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Divorce". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_env_ec (changed metadata) - - % of respondents choosing "don't know" when asked "Here are two statements people sometimes make when discussing the environment and economic growth. Which of them comes closer to your own point of view? A. Protecting the environment should be given priority, even if it causes slower economic growth and some loss of jobs B. Economic growth and creating jobs should be the top priority, even if the environment suffers to some extent" ? ^^^^^ + + % of respondents choosing "Don‘t know" when asked "Here are two statements people sometimes make when discussing the environment and economic growth. Which of them comes closer to your own point of view? A. Protecting the environment should be given priority, even if it causes slower economic growth and some loss of jobs B. Economic growth and creating jobs should be the top priority, even if the environment suffers to some extent" ? ^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_eq_ineq (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I would like you to tell me your views on various issues. How would you place your views on this scale? 1 means you agree completely with the statement on the left; 10 means you agree completely with the statement on the right; and if your views fall somewhere in between, you can choose any number in between." in the statement "Incomes should be made more equal vs There should be greater incentives for individual effort". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I would like you to tell me your views on various issues. How would you place your views on this scale? 1 means you agree completely with the statement on the left; 10 means you agree completely with the statement on the right; and if your views fall somewhere in between, you can choose any number in between." in the statement "Incomes should be made more equal vs There should be greater incentives for individual effort". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_euthanasia (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Euthanasia". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Euthanasia". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_good_time (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person to have a good time". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person to have a good time". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_happy (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Taking all things together, would you say you are very happy, quite happy, not very happy or not at all happy?" ? ^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Taking all things together, would you say you are very happy, quite happy, not very happy or not at all happy?" ? ^ ~ Column dont_know_having_casual_sex (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Having casual sex". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Having casual sex". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_help_others (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person to help the people nearby". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person to help the people nearby". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_homosexuality (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Homosexuality". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Homosexuality". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ - - Column dont_know_homosx_prnts ~ Column dont_know_important_in_life_family (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Family". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Family". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_important_in_life_friends (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Friends". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Friends". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_important_in_life_leisure_time (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Leisure time". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Leisure time". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_important_in_life_politics (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Politics". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Politics". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_important_in_life_religion (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Religion". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Religion". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_important_in_life_work (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Work". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is very important, rather important, not very important or not important at all?" in the item "Work". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_interested_politics (changed metadata) - - description_short: '% of respondents replying "don''t know" when asked "How interested would you say you are in politics?"' ? ^^ + + description_short: '% of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "How interested would you say you are in politics?"' ? ^ ~ Column dont_know_invitro_fertilization (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Invitro fertilization". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Invitro fertilization". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_lei_vs_wk (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Which point on this scale most clearly describes how much weight you place on work (including housework and schoolwork), as compared with leisure or recreation? A It´s leisure that makes life worth living, not work B Work is what makes life worth living, not leisure", where 1 is description A and 5 is description B. ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Which point on this scale most clearly describes how much weight you place on work (including housework and schoolwork), as compared with leisure or recreation? A It´s leisure that makes life worth living, not work B Work is what makes life worth living, not leisure", where 1 is description A and 5 is description B. ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_losing_job (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "To what degree are you worried about the following situations?", when the situation was "Losing my job or not finding a job". ? ^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "To what degree are you worried about the following situations?", when the situation was "Losing my job or not finding a job". ? ^ ~ Column dont_know_man_beating_wife (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Man beating wife". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Man beating wife". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_most_serious (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "I’m going to read out some problems. Please indicate which of the following problems you consider the most serious one for the world as a whole?" The problems listed were: "People living in poverty and need", "Discrimination against girls and women", "Poor sanitation and infectious diseases", "Inadequate education", and "Environmental pollution" ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "I’m going to read out some problems. Please indicate which of the following problems you consider the most serious one for the world as a whole?" The problems listed were: "People living in poverty and need", "Discrimination against girls and women", "Poor sanitation and infectious diseases", "Inadequate education", and "Environmental pollution" ? ^^ - - Column dont_know_neighbors_aids - - Column dont_know_neighbors_different_language - - Column dont_know_neighbors_different_race - - Column dont_know_neighbors_different_religion - - Column dont_know_neighbors_drug_addicts - - Column dont_know_neighbors_gypsies - - Column dont_know_neighbors_heavy_drinkers - - Column dont_know_neighbors_homosexuals - - Column dont_know_neighbors_inmigrant_foreign_workers - - Column dont_know_neighbors_unmarried_couples ~ Column dont_know_new_ideas (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person to think up new ideas and be creative". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person to think up new ideas and be creative". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_not_being_able_to_provide_good_education (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "To what degree are you worried about the following situations?", when the situation was "Not being able to give one's children a good education". ? ^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "To what degree are you worried about the following situations?", when the situation was "Not being able to give one's children a good education". ? ^ ~ Column dont_know_parents_beating_children (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Parents beating their children". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Parents beating their children". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_political_action_attending_peaceful_demonstrations (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I would like you to look at this card. I am going to read out some different forms of political action that people can take, and I would like you to tell me, for each one, whether you have actually done any of these things, whether you might do it or would never, under any circumstances, do it." in the item "Attending peaceful demonstrations". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I would like you to look at this card. I am going to read out some different forms of political action that people can take, and I would like you to tell me, for each one, whether you have actually done any of these things, whether you might do it or would never, under any circumstances, do it." in the item "Attending peaceful demonstrations". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_political_action_joining_in_boycotts (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I would like you to look at this card. I am going to read out some different forms of political action that people can take, and I would like you to tell me, for each one, whether you have actually done any of these things, whether you might do it or would never, under any circumstances, do it." in the item "Joining in boycotts". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I would like you to look at this card. I am going to read out some different forms of political action that people can take, and I would like you to tell me, for each one, whether you have actually done any of these things, whether you might do it or would never, under any circumstances, do it." in the item "Joining in boycotts". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_political_action_joining_unofficial_strikes (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I would like you to look at this card. I am going to read out some different forms of political action that people can take, and I would like you to tell me, for each one, whether you have actually done any of these things, whether you might do it or would never, under any circumstances, do it." in the item "Joining unofficial strikes". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I would like you to look at this card. I am going to read out some different forms of political action that people can take, and I would like you to tell me, for each one, whether you have actually done any of these things, whether you might do it or would never, under any circumstances, do it." in the item "Joining unofficial strikes". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_political_action_signing_a_petition (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I would like you to look at this card. I am going to read out some different forms of political action that people can take, and I would like you to tell me, for each one, whether you have actually done any of these things, whether you might do it or would never, under any circumstances, do it." in the item "Signed a petition". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I would like you to look at this card. I am going to read out some different forms of political action that people can take, and I would like you to tell me, for each one, whether you have actually done any of these things, whether you might do it or would never, under any circumstances, do it." in the item "Signed a petition". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_political_violence (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Political violence". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Political violence". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_prostitution (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Prostitution". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Prostitution". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_respect_environment (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person looking after the environment". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person looking after the environment". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_rich (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person to be rich". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person to be rich". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_risks (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person adventure and taking risks". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person adventure and taking risks". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_secure (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person living in secure surroundings". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person living in secure surroundings". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_sex_before_marriage (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Sex before marriage". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Sex before marriage". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_stealing_property (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Stealing property". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Stealing property". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_success (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person being very successful". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person being very successful". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_suicide (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Suicide". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Suicide". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_terrorist_attack (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "To what degree are you worried about the following situations?", when the situation was "A terrorist attack". ? ^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "To what degree are you worried about the following situations?", when the situation was "A terrorist attack". ? ^ ~ Column dont_know_tradition (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person tradition". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Now I will briefly describe some people. Using this card, would you please indicate for each description whether that person is very much like you, like you, somewhat like you, a little like you, not like you, or not at all like you?" in the description "It is important to this person tradition". ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ Column dont_know_violence_against_other_people (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Violence against other people". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card", when the statement was "Violence against other people". In the scale, 1 means "never justifiable" and 10 means "always justifiable". ? ^^ ~ Column dont_know_war (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "To what degree are you worried about the following situations?", when the situation was "A war involving my country". ? ^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "To what degree are you worried about the following situations?", when the situation was "A war involving my country". ? ^ ~ Column dont_know_work_is_a_duty (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Work is a duty towards society". ? ^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Work is a duty towards society". ? ^ ~ Column dont_know_work_should_come_first (changed metadata) - - % of respondents replying "don't know" when asked "Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Work should always come first, even if it means less spare time". ? ^ + + % of respondents replying "don‘t know" when asked "Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Work should always come first, even if it means less spare time". ? ^ - - Column mentioned_neighbors_aids - - Column mentioned_neighbors_different_language - - Column mentioned_neighbors_different_race - - Column mentioned_neighbors_different_religion - - Column mentioned_neighbors_drug_addicts - - Column mentioned_neighbors_gypsies - - Column mentioned_neighbors_heavy_drinkers - - Column mentioned_neighbors_homosexuals - - Column mentioned_neighbors_inmigrant_foreign_workers - - Column mentioned_neighbors_unmarried_couples - - Column neither_homosx_prnts - - Column no_answer_homosx_prnts - - Column no_answer_neighbors_aids - - Column no_answer_neighbors_different_language - - Column no_answer_neighbors_different_race - - Column no_answer_neighbors_different_religion - - Column no_answer_neighbors_drug_addicts - - Column no_answer_neighbors_gypsies - - Column no_answer_neighbors_heavy_drinkers - - Column no_answer_neighbors_homosexuals - - Column no_answer_neighbors_inmigrant_foreign_workers - - Column no_answer_neighbors_unmarried_couples - - Column notmentioned_neighbors_aids - - Column notmentioned_neighbors_different_language - - Column notmentioned_neighbors_different_race - - Column notmentioned_neighbors_different_religion - - Column notmentioned_neighbors_drug_addicts - - Column notmentioned_neighbors_gypsies - - Column notmentioned_neighbors_heavy_drinkers - - Column notmentioned_neighbors_homosexuals - - Column notmentioned_neighbors_inmigrant_foreign_workers - - Column notmentioned_neighbors_unmarried_couples - - Column strongly_agree_homosx_prnts - - Column strongly_disagree_homosx_prnts = Dataset garden/lgbt_rights/2024-06-03/equaldex ~ Table equaldex (changed metadata) - - title: Equaldex - - description: |- - - Equaldex is a collaborative knowledge base for the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) movement. The site aims to crowdsource every law related to LGBT rights to provide a comprehensive and global view of the LGBT rights movement. ~ Dim country - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) year country 1979 British Virgin Islands 1955 French Polynesia 2022 Guernsey 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 Puerto Rico ~ Dim year - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year British Virgin Islands 1979 French Polynesia 1955 Guernsey 2022 Puerto Rico 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 ~ Column adoption (changed metadata, changed data) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption British Virgin Islands 1979 Single only French Polynesia 1955 NaN Guernsey 2022 Legal Puerto Rico 1957 NaN Puerto Rico 2013 NaN ~ Column adoption_ambiguous_count (changed metadata) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption_ambiguous_count British Virgin Islands 1979 French Polynesia 1955 Guernsey 2022 Puerto Rico 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 ~ Column adoption_ambiguous_pop (changed metadata) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption_ambiguous_pop British Virgin Islands 1979 French Polynesia 1955 Guernsey 2022 Puerto Rico 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 ~ Column adoption_current (changed metadata, changed data) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption_current British Virgin Islands 1979 NaN French Polynesia 1955 NaN Guernsey 2022 NaN Puerto Rico 1957 NaN Puerto Rico 2013 NaN ~ Column adoption_illegal_count (changed metadata) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption_illegal_count British Virgin Islands 1979 French Polynesia 1955 Guernsey 2022 Puerto Rico 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 ~ Column adoption_illegal_pop (changed metadata) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption_illegal_pop British Virgin Islands 1979 French Polynesia 1955 Guernsey 2022 Puerto Rico 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 ~ Column adoption_legal_count (changed metadata, changed data) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption_legal_count British Virgin Islands 1979 French Polynesia 1955 Guernsey 2022 Puerto Rico 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 ~ Changed values: 401 / 15075 (2.66%) country year adoption_legal_count - adoption_legal_count + Africa 2009 2 1 Africa 2015 4 1 Asia 1953 3 0 Oceania 1973 4 0 South America 2021 8 5 ~ Column adoption_legal_pop (changed metadata, changed data) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption_legal_pop British Virgin Islands 1979 French Polynesia 1955 Guernsey 2022 Puerto Rico 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 ~ Changed values: 263 / 15075 (1.74%) country year adoption_legal_pop - adoption_legal_pop + Africa 1958 5352 0 Oceania 1978 116271 0 Oceania 1999 173023 0 World 1962 89355 0 World 2001 47166783 46984398 ~ Column adoption_missing_count (changed metadata, changed data) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption_missing_count British Virgin Islands 1979 French Polynesia 1955 Guernsey 2022 Puerto Rico 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 ~ Changed values: 497 / 15075 (3.30%) country year adoption_missing_count - adoption_missing_count + Asia 1977 17 15 North America 1991 20 11 North America 2020 4 1 Oceania 1998 9 4 World 1971 111 85 ~ Column adoption_missing_pop (changed metadata, changed data) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption_missing_pop British Virgin Islands 1979 French Polynesia 1955 Guernsey 2022 Puerto Rico 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 ~ Changed values: 462 / 15075 (3.06%) country year adoption_missing_pop - adoption_missing_pop + Africa 1971 72414256 72498869 Asia 1953 739978033 740951370 Asia 1988 376095235 378058493 Asia 1993 335028864 337439515 North America 1950 207792716 207970520 ~ Column adoption_second_parent_adoption_only_count (changed metadata, changed data) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption_second_parent_adoption_only_count British Virgin Islands 1979 French Polynesia 1955 Guernsey 2022 Puerto Rico 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 ~ Changed values: 12 / 15075 (0.08%) country year adoption_second_parent_adoption_only_count - adoption_second_parent_adoption_only_count + North America 2011 1 0 North America 2013 1 0 World 2009 2 1 World 2013 5 4 World 2014 6 5 ~ Column adoption_second_parent_adoption_only_pop (changed metadata, changed data) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + - We present this data only for sovereign states, defined by [Butcher and Griffiths (2020)](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sovereign-state-butcher-griffiths). We use the definitions of the latest year available. - - Removed values: 3975 / 15075 (26.37%) country year adoption_second_parent_adoption_only_pop British Virgin Islands 1979 French Polynesia 1955 Guernsey 2022 Puerto Rico 1957 Puerto Rico 2013 ~ Changed values: 12 / 15075 (0.08%) country year adoption_second_parent_adoption_only_pop - adoption_second_parent_adoption_only_pop + North America 2011 56310 0 North America 2013 56116 0 World 2009 5395274 5338813 World 2013 97727497 97671381 World 2014 144675165 144619193 ~ Column adoption_single_only_count (changed metadata, changed data) - - - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we assign the earliest year in the series (1950) to construct the most complete data as possible. + + - Whenever policy implementation dates for a status are not provided in the data, and this status is the only available for the country, we consider that this status has not changed during the entire period of the dataset. + + ...diff too long, truncated... ``` Automatically updated datasets matching _weekly_wildfires|excess_mortality|covid|fluid|flunet|country_profile|garden/ihme_gbd/2019/gbd_risk_ are not included

Edited: 2024-06-19 10:45:20 UTC Execution time: 4.29 seconds