Closed matentzn closed 1 year ago
Obsolesence reasons are a very important piece of metadata to document why a term was obsoleted. These are represented in OMO as OWL Individuals.
Right now, OBO format is not able to reference a named individual as a value of an annotation, so it pushes everything in the owl-axiom header.
The current workaround, using IRI syntax for the values but otherwise removing all Indivdual declarations, is very unsatisfactory.
Related discussion I had forgotten about: https://github.com/information-artifact-ontology/ontology-metadata/issues/81
Seems this may not be an OBO issue after all..
Obsolesence reasons are a very important piece of metadata to document why a term was obsoleted. These are represented in OMO as OWL Individuals.
Right now, OBO format is not able to reference a named individual as a value of an annotation, so it pushes everything in the owl-axiom header.
The current workaround, using IRI syntax for the values but otherwise removing all Indivdual declarations, is very unsatisfactory.