ignazio1977
commented
3 years ago I'm no named graph expert, so I have a few basic questions, sorry if the answer is obvious:
- is the named graph IRI always intended to be the ontology IRI? (if the ontology is not anonymous)
- if not, should the value be overridable?
- is this a functionality expected of the library, or would a developer expect to have to take action to make this happen? (i.e., someone using the RIO libraries without OWLAPI in the mix: would they expect to have to set something, or does RIO adopt this behaviour by default, and so OWLAPI is actively preventing an expected behaviour?)
Looking at the implementation, I believe it's easier to add this functionality directly in the RIO storer without changing interfaces, which would reduce the size of the fix considerably.
It's also possible to build a simple override mechanism using the parameter map that exists already on OWLDocumentFormat - this could be used if the ontology IRI is not supposed to always be used, or if the choice should be left to the calling application instead of to the OWL API.
I'll put my proposed implementation in a different pull request to simplify comparisons.
NicolasRouquette
Fixes #1002