Open fcbr opened 8 years ago
I think you could subdivide the issue into: a. exposing the PWN links, which are "golden", as they are our baseline and b. exposing the OWN-PT links, which are not even bronze, yet.
podemos seguir idéia do Francis Bond para links entre senses.
@hmuniz can you comment here? You implemented it right? I see the new links.
But I didn’t see the morphosemantic links yet
33a651e243ba9a16ec8ad6515be50a1a3db41a6b implements the first step. I added the relation between word senses inspired by Francis' idea.
The following table contains the relations thar are being covered by that first step, the second column contains the symbol used by the interface to represent the relation:
RELATION | INTERFACE |
---|---|
wn30_en_antonymOf | ant |
wn30_en_causes | cause |
wn30_en_classifiedByRegion | mr |
wn30_en_classifiedByTopic | mt |
wn30_en_classifiedByUsage | mu |
wn30_en_classifiesByRegion | dr |
wn30_en_classifiesByTopic | dt |
wn30_en_classifiesByUsage | du |
wn30_en_derivationallyRelated | drf |
wn30_en_participleOf | pv |
wn30_en_pertainsTo | pe |
wn30_en_property | prp |
wn30_en_sameVerbGroupAs | vg |
wn30_en_seeAlso | see |
OK. can you confirm if the morpholinks (usually available at https://wordnet.princeton.edu/download) were imported to ES?
Now that we have the infrastructure in place, we should add the links between words and word senses in the interface. This issue tracks the decision on how to implement this visually. Maybe we should initially follow OWM and then expand as needed.
There are two types of links that need to be designed: