Open owx0130 opened 5 months ago
No details provided by team.
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Redundant multiplicity notation in DG
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
In the class diagram on page 6 and 10, there is a multiplicity of0..*
, this could be replaced with*
instead since they are the same.
[original: nus-cs2113-AY2324S2/pe-interim#988] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Yes, but it does not hinder the user's ability to understand the DG, since 0.. and are both accepted forms of the same multiplicity.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
incorrect multiplicities used here again.
0..*
should just be*