Since package.ox must exist "at the root of every source tree", should it be treated as a namespace which defines symbols containing package version data? How does that work with the current proposed restrictions on top level forms ala providing and soforth? It certainly prevents users from defining their own namespace which happens to be named package (which may well be acceptable).
Since
package.oxmust exist "at the root of every source tree", should it be treated as a namespace which defines symbols containing package version data? How does that work with the current proposed restrictions on top level forms alaprovidingand soforth? It certainly prevents users from defining their own namespace which happens to be namedpackage(which may well be acceptable).