Open philipwfowler opened 1 year ago
That looks like another case of large deletions in minor populations, but it also doesn't look like it should have been a minor population anyway. The example above deletes all of ethA + a bit more, but is given as a minor population with FRS of 1.0
, so may require some digging
I'd suggest a quick fix could be just setting vcf evidence to None
in these situations, because as you said this seems like an odd VCF case. Possibly worth opening an issue in minos
/clockwork
?
Agreed, could we go with the quick fix i.e. report None
. Thanks.
At first glance it looks like one of the other Issues, but this one has no
MAX_DP
filter fail but looking in the VCF does have some peculiar floats forALLELE_DP
e.g. theINFO
block at position 4326907 isyet this is marked as
MIN_FRS
becauseFRS=0.8544
but it isn't obvious how that is calculated from either theALLELE_DP
or theCOV
!site.04.subj.04897.lab.933331.iso.1.v0.12.4.per_sample.vcf.gz
Estimate affects 23 samples out of 44k.
Note: most of these seem to be in the region of 4326900 (as is the example here) which is in ethA and therefore in the minor_alleles.txt. If I remove the genome indices corresponding to ethA, the VCF file processes. If this is insoluble/hard, that might be the answer, however there are many rows in the catalogue that associate mutations in ethA with resistance to ETH.