raducoravu
commented
10 years ago The "editor-perspective.dita" is so heavily profiled inside that it could probably be split in two topics, one for standalone (editor, author, developer) and one for eclipse (editor, author, developer). The same for "results-view.dita".
Also the "editor-perspective.dita" should contain links to the available views like Outline, Project, Attributes, Entities which are documented in some other topics. But we've got both an "outliner-view.dita" which seems to be documented both for standalone and eclipse and an "outline-view.dita" which seems to have been created specifically for eclipse.
I'm not completely sure how this particular situation should be handled though.
The editor-perspectives.dita file has a number of sub topics on the various views in the editor perspective. Currently all of those sub-topics are profiled eclipse only (and have eclipse screenshots). Only one topic, results-view.dita is unprofiled. editor-perspectives.dita is also unprofiled, which means that in the standalone documentation, results view is the only subtopic.
http://www.oxygenxml.com/doc/ug-editor/#topics/editor-perspective.html
I see that anonymous has commented on this in the online docs. It is not clear to me if this is a profiling error or a missing content error.
In any case, I have profiled results-view.dita to exclude it from the AuthorSDK and SVNClient docs, as this was causing validation errors due to unresolvable links.