This is a tricky one. Currently I do not know how to achieve this. Hence this is not assigned to a milestone yet.
To my current knowledge, expressions involving pointers can only be interpreted correctly by considering previous declarations. This semantic analysis goes beyond the capabilities of a syntax definition.
Or maybe there can be formulated a set of rules which cover all cases in which pointers can reliably matched.
Asterisks of pointers can be distinguished from the multiplication operator, if the preceding pattern is not a numeric literal or series of word characters. Right? 🤔
This is a tricky one. Currently I do not know how to achieve this. Hence this is not assigned to a milestone yet.
To my current knowledge, expressions involving pointers can only be interpreted correctly by considering previous declarations. This semantic analysis goes beyond the capabilities of a syntax definition.
Or maybe there can be formulated a set of rules which cover all cases in which pointers can reliably matched.
Asterisks of pointers can be distinguished from the multiplication operator, if the preceding pattern is not a numeric literal or series of word characters. Right? 🤔