For some reasons, I could not use kallisto on my data, and I rather had to use the aforementionned tools. I am now wondering whether I could still use sleuth on the output I have.
In particular
1) Do you so any strong reason to not try using sleuth on those outputs?
2) I think I would have to transform my read counts into estimated read counts similar to the ones given by kallisto - is there anyway to do this with the info I have ?
Thank you for reading me.
Edit: there were errors in the table I have; the output is in Read Count and not estimated counts (else I could directly use sleuth).
Dear Patcher-lab,
I have used some pantranscriptomics tool to map RNA-seq reads on a pangenome graph, from this paper and that github.
The final output I have is a table giving read counts, effective length, as well as other features :
For some reasons, I could not use
kallisto
on my data, and I rather had to use the aforementionned tools. I am now wondering whether I could still usesleuth
on the output I have.In particular
1) Do you so any strong reason to not try using
sleuth
on those outputs?2) I think I would have to transform my read counts into estimated read counts similar to the ones given by
kallisto
- is there anyway to do this with the info I have ?Thank you for reading me.
Edit: there were errors in the table I have; the output is in Read Count and not estimated counts (else I could directly use
sleuth
).