It seems that B_t / B_0 is calculated from MCMC output as
median(B_t) / median(B_0) [median is calculated across MCMC values]
rather than
median( B_t / B_0) [calculate the ratio for each MCMC then take the median].
In our assessments using Awatea we did the latter, so I just want to check that the former is always done throughout the SS code. And we should mention this somewhere for clarity, and clarify the text in the one-page summary (and probably elsewhere), which last year implied that the latter definition was used.
So someone should confirm that the former is always done (I expect it is for consistency).
And the text should be clearer about this.
As an example, in the phase plot in Figure 34, some of the code is:
make.phase.plot(...) {
...
sb0 <- model$mcmccalcs$sinit[2] [the [2] extracts the median ]
...
sb <- smed[yrs %in% c(start.yr:(end.yr-1))]/sb0 [smed is the median spawning biomass for each year]
It seems that B_t / B_0 is calculated from MCMC output as
median(B_t) / median(B_0) [median is calculated across MCMC values]
rather than
median( B_t / B_0) [calculate the ratio for each MCMC then take the median].
In our assessments using Awatea we did the latter, so I just want to check that the former is always done throughout the SS code. And we should mention this somewhere for clarity, and clarify the text in the one-page summary (and probably elsewhere), which last year implied that the latter definition was used.
So someone should confirm that the former is always done (I expect it is for consistency).
And the text should be clearer about this.
As an example, in the phase plot in Figure 34, some of the code is:
make.phase.plot(...) { ... sb0 <- model$mcmccalcs$sinit[2] [the [2] extracts the median ] ... sb <- smed[yrs %in% c(start.yr:(end.yr-1))]/sb0 [smed is the median spawning biomass for each year]
so it is calculating median / median.