Closed aaronmberger-nwfsc closed 4 years ago
Chris and I made the decision to just quickly run this missing sensitivity (missing relative to last year). So you will need to:
I have changed the bit of text that describes this run in the sensitivity section. I still have the correlation part to do (doing now), but that is another issue.
I did it. Worked perfectly first time.
Damn, I thought build()
would just find the one missing the .Rdata file, as everything is FALSE. (This is sooo last week...). And I get an error:
Error in fetch_retrospectives(model$retropath, retrospective_yrs) :
object 'retros_list' not found
Ugh - and I can't recover the .Rdata file from my recycle bin.It was for 2020.01.23_age1Survey.Rdata
Just run build again with both models as a vector:
build(.model_list = c("2020.01.23_age1Survey", "2020.01.37_semiPara_tvSelect_sig1.0"))
Aha, my retros were only to 10 but now it thinks they're to 20. But we don't need them for appendix. Have deleted the retros folder and rebuilt the .RData file.
Ooh, I get to close. Realised I didn't finish the QAQC on sensitivity input files (did the base model ones a couple of weeks back). Mean to go back and do them once we had the new model. My bad. Figured we might spot any glaring issues, like this one!
Looks like we have two equivalent models in t.v. sensitivity plot:
Sensitivity models group 4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
sens.model.dir.names.4 <- c("2020.01.27_tvSelect_phi_extralow", "2020.01.28_tvSelect_phi_low", "2020.01.29_tvSelect_phi_high", "2020.01.26_semiPara_tvSelect_sig0.695", "2020.01.26_semiPara_tvSelect_sig0.695") sens.model.names.4 <- c("Phi t.v. selectivity (0.21)", "Phi t.v. selectivity (0.70)", "Phi t.v. selectivity (2.10)", "Semi-Parametric t.v selectivity (0.695)", "Semi-Parametric t.v. selectivity (1.0)")
We only compare 0.695.