Closed 1beb closed 3 years ago
Yes, I'd love to get some additional content. However, given the current README is already long and I'd like to retain the current flow of content, it probably makes sense to have additional content as one or more additional Markdown files that I can link to from the README.
Both of your suggested additions sound good. How about you do a PR with the new content and then we can work out how to organize things.
NTS: Also discuss process design to take full advantage of future topologies:
Example:
library(dplyr)
library(future)
library(furrr)
# plan(cluster, manual = TRUE)
plan(list(
tweak(cluster, manual = TRUE),
multisession
))
scheduler_fun <- function(i) {
df <- data.frame(
task = i,
thost = Sys.info()[["nodename"]],
tpid = Sys.getpid()
)
node_fun(df)
}
node_fun <- function(dft) {
future_map_dfr(1:7, function(x) {
dfb <- data.frame(
res = mean(rnorm(1*10^x)),
lhost = Sys.info()[["nodename"]],
lpid = Sys.getpid(),
lcores = parallelly::availableCores()
)
dplyr::bind_cols(dft, dfb)
}
)
}
r <- future_map(1:20, scheduler_fun)
bind_rows(r)
See #9
Hello @paciorek,
Would you be welcome to a PR that adds sections on:
a) Using AWS ECR b) Extending the dockerfile to deal with secrets and private github repositories
As this respository is largely an "article" of sorts, perhaps you would prefer these sections written as standalones in an issue such that you can integrate them as you please? Some of the other elements of the article may be better presented in a question and answer format (like an FAQ). Perhaps these would fit that mold as well.