Open pombredanne opened 5 months ago
Do you have the links to the threads? I'm curious what the use case is. Project !=Package. In fact I have asserted for >10 years that the major problem with CPE is that it maps to just a project... where a project like Struts has ~80 packages, making it useless for most use cases. Having a pURL recreate that lossy coordinate would be a huge step backwards.
Do you have the links to the threads?
https://lists.apache.org/thread/vc3h1t7plq3sgtqvp385s4nlo3l7rry7 and https://lists.apache.org/thread/75l9f8bcs9fm232p2j3prbj9fw2or2k5 come to mind.
the major problem with CPE is that it maps to just a project... where a project like Struts has ~80 packages, making it useless for most use cases. Having a pURL recreate that lossy coordinate would be a huge step backwards.
That would be good to flesh out. I could see an approach where we use the PMC id as the first segment, and the PMC can determine whether/how to add further detail - something like pkg:asf/celix
could perhaps stand on its own, while struts might introduce pkg:asf/struts/oval-plugin
etc for its various components. We should probably give some guidance on how to apply that. WDYT?
Most Apache projects fall into existing support for package ecosystems already supported by purl. See https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?language
Per definition, a purl is:
a URL string used to identify and locate a software package...
I cannot locate pkg:asf/struts/oval-plugin
. Is on Maven Central or somewhere else? Additionally, oval-plugin
already has a purl which is:
pkg:maven/org.apache.struts/struts2-oval-plugin@x.x.x
therefore adding pkg:asf/struts/oval-plugin
would introduce confusion IMO.
We should define a package type for ASF projects (Apache Software Foundation)
The spec mentioned originally
apache for Apache projects packages
. The direction may be to useasf
rather thanapache
.There have been on-going discussion on the ASF mailing lists on the topic and we need to collect these links for reference and invite the ASF folks to join and help define this (important) package type!
@raboof ping