packit / packit-service

Packit provided as a service
https://packit.dev
MIT License
34 stars 46 forks source link

Fix flask restarts #2413

Closed majamassarini closed 2 months ago

majamassarini commented 2 months ago

Make usage function calls cacheable. Collect usage statistics in a long running celery worker.

softwarefactory-project-zuul[bot] commented 2 months ago

Build failed. https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/bec49780825e4f448a7b26d57d34a1e9

:heavy_check_mark: pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 36s :x: packit-service-tests TIMED_OUT in 30m 23s

majamassarini commented 2 months ago

recheck

softwarefactory-project-zuul[bot] commented 2 months ago

Build failed. https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/cdd2c35345d149a49f4b708e53c410ff

:heavy_check_mark: pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 37s :x: packit-service-tests TIMED_OUT in 30m 27s

softwarefactory-project-zuul[bot] commented 2 months ago

Build failed. https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/540a97572a4f426192d6876b09400dcf

:heavy_check_mark: pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 47s :x: packit-service-tests TIMED_OUT in 30m 27s

softwarefactory-project-zuul[bot] commented 2 months ago

Build failed. https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/853f73bd52e2458daa65e96b723f0044

:heavy_check_mark: pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 18s :x: packit-service-tests FAILURE in 6m 21s

softwarefactory-project-zuul[bot] commented 2 months ago

Build succeeded. https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/6dc4b6b2dc4c4752bfe8eb3fa69398e0

:heavy_check_mark: pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 18s :heavy_check_mark: packit-service-tests SUCCESS in 2m 27s

softwarefactory-project-zuul[bot] commented 2 months ago

Build succeeded (gate pipeline). https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/afc47f7c971449c49b96bf87d1bbec0f

:heavy_check_mark: pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 34s

sentry-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

Suspect Issues

This pull request was deployed and Sentry observed the following issues:

Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎