Closed tienvx closed 8 months ago
Right but in this case it's nonsense coverage. If you were to run infection over this type of coverage it might still be low, because as one of the tests states, there are no assertions. We're simply expecting that calling something won't explode.
Replaced pactffi_string_delete
by pactffi_check_regex
which return a result. Added an assertion to assert the result. Does it look a bit better?
The purpose of this test is only to increase code coverage