spec().stores() may support a custom function

[wine-fall]

• Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I just feel the using of spec().stores() is too black box for me because the args passed to it are all string type and I don't know how does it work.

• Describe the solution you'd like May be a stores() with custom function passed is better. eg:

  spec()
  .stores((req, res) => {
  return {
    sth,
  };
  })

• Describe alternatives you've considered I read the doc and find there is a solution which is pactum.handler.addCaptureHandler. However, I just think it's not convenient and I have to use stores() and pass two string to it too.

• Additional context I just create a pr and if you guys agree it to be merged, I'm going to add some words to the doc.

[wine-fall]

By the way, to be honest, there are lots of types of pactum is so confusing. eg:

withHeaders(headers: object): Spec;

something like this may be better:

withHeaders<T>(headers: T): Spec;

[ASaiAnudeep]

You can create a different issue to track the type definition changes.

[wine-fall]

hi @ASaiAnudeep:

thanks for merging my code! I just update the doc and types of stores, please check.

As for the optimization of other types, I think translating the whole things to typescript is a better choice. And if you'd like to do it in future, I'm happy to join it.

Anyway, I will update some types of pactumjs when I using it and create another issue to track it.