Closed rfarouni closed 2 years ago
Hi Rick,
Thanks for raising this, appreciate feedback from users. I've made a note to update these cutoffs with the next db release (so the change carries over to the precomputed dataset on the webserver as well).
Cheers,
Simon
Hi,
It seems to me that the HMMs for the RT genes icity0039, icity0040 have a target coverage threshold in the meta file that is too high. I would set it to 0.3 so it would be easier to detect an RT in a fusion gene. I was experimenting with your thresholds and I discovered that I missed a well-known cas-rt fusion gene with the set threshold of 0.5.
Rick,