Open neko-kai opened 6 years ago
It's possible that I'm using the term incorrectly. I haven't found a concise definition of coeffect yet, so I'm equating them with computational effects which can be modeled in the co-Kleisli category of some comonad. It's not clear to me if that's complete or even correct, but it models enough things that I'm interested in that I thought it would be understandable to reuse the term. I'm happy to replace it if it is in fact incorrect.
I don't think "comonad-derived monadic effects" is the right thing though, since the monadic bit is somewhat separate. It's one way of navigating a space of application states modelled by a comonad, but it's not the only way.
Hi Phil,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the term 'coeffect' seems to have a different meaning than
comonad effects
: