Expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let other devs (and not only) understand how to reuse/adapt/modify your code in other open projects and vice-versa.
As you certainly know, expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let anyone better/faster understand how to reuse/adapt/modify sources (and not only) in other open projects and vice-versa.
Although it may sounds like a minor aspect, license file omission obviously causes an inconsistent generation of the relative badge too:
Anyway you can easily choose a "correct" one through the GH's license wizard tool.
Last but not least, let us know how - in your opinion - we could improve categorization/sorting of collected projects in order to push their evolution by favouring collaborations between developers (and not only).
MarcoRavich
commented
1 month ago
Hi there, 1st of all thanks for your awesome work !
Since we've "doxed" it in our HyMPS project (under the AUDIO section \ AI-based page \ Drums), can you please add a "GH-compliant" license file ?
Expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let other devs (and not only) understand how to reuse/adapt/modify your code in other open projects and vice-versa.
As you certainly know, expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let anyone better/faster understand how to reuse/adapt/modify sources (and not only) in other open projects and vice-versa.
Although it may sounds like a minor aspect, license file omission obviously causes an inconsistent generation of the relative badge too:
Anyway you can easily choose a "correct" one through the GH's license wizard tool.
Last but not least, let us know how - in your opinion - we could improve categorization/sorting of collected projects in order to push their evolution by favouring collaborations between developers (and not only).
Thanks in advance.