Open paing-oo opened 2 years ago
The suggestion for having a warning is valid. However, we believe that it should not be considered a feature flaw as the user is still able to simply find all the interviews for the "closed" position by filtering.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Initially, the position at index 1, Senior Software Developer has 5 openings.
There were 2 interviews scheduled for this position.
When I edited the openings of this position to 0 using the command:
edit -p 1 o/0
It allows me to edit the openings of this position to 0 without showing me any warning that this position has interviews scheduled. Hence as a user, if I wanted to temporarily close a position, I might miss out on the interviews that are already scheduled for the position and hence might not be able to inform the applicants.