Open dmikusa opened 12 months ago
@dmikusa @anthonydahanne The changes on v1 are reverted. Shall we change the possible solution? If you could help me understand how you want to proceed with this, I can work on this.
ah, that's a good point. now since we're talking v2, I think it could apply here - wdyt @dmikusa ? cc @pivotal-david-osullivan
Yes, I agree. You can resubmit the PR against the v2 branch. That will get things moving.
I do want to have another think through all this, to contemplate the offline use case. That's what was overlooked previously.
The title seems to be misleading... If I followed all the correct links, then the original PR #273 was reverted on main
, right? I guess best would be to close this issue and instead reopen #274 - no?
@loewenstein I updated it.
Describe the Enhancement
See #273
Motivation
See https://github.com/paketo-buildpacks/libpak/pull/273
Possible Solution
Port to release-2.x, but we also need to consider how this impacts offline usage.