Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Thanks. But I'm not sure it's good. What the real profit?
Original comment by serj.kalichev@gmail.com
on 9 Oct 2013 at 9:54
Why wouldn't you want to load every file in the given directory?
It's required for me because I organize my xml into module directories, and add
or remove symlinks depending on what xml needs to be loaded.
Original comment by mark.s.m...@gmail.com
on 9 Oct 2013 at 3:20
For Example I have:
klish-enable/Config/route.xml
klish-enable/Config/ip.xml
klish-enable/Config/users.xml
klish-enable/Show/route.xml
klish-enable/Show/ip.xml
klish-enable/Show/users.xml
With the current functionality of klish. Those files will not load if you use
a single xml path of klish-enable/
Original comment by mark.s.m...@gmail.com
on 9 Oct 2013 at 3:23
What do you think about -R (or -r) clish option to turn on recursive xml search?
Original comment by serj.kalichev@gmail.com
on 14 Oct 2013 at 10:56
I also like this feature.
I agree with adding a new command to turn on recursive search since we don't
want to break existing behavior.
Original comment by corent...@gmail.com
on 14 Oct 2013 at 5:02
-r/-R works for me. Backwards compatibility is always nice.
Original comment by mark.s.m...@gmail.com
on 14 Oct 2013 at 6:35
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mark.s.m...@gmail.com
on 8 Oct 2013 at 8:54Attachments: