Before this PR:
TimestampRange and BASAI were inside another class.
After this PR:
These are both going to be persistable types, so I promoted them to their own class for that work.
==COMMIT_MSG==
==COMMIT_MSG==
Priority:
Concerns / possible downsides (what feedback would you like?):
Should these versions be persistable? Or should I create Stored* wrappers around them? Seems unnecessary, given that they're usage original was from a stored version, but one could argue that these are views of a stored version (that said, the refactoring to enable that later is simple)
What do the change types mean?
- `feature`: A new feature of the service.
- `improvement`: An incremental improvement in the functionality or operation of the service.
- `fix`: Remedies the incorrect behaviour of a component of the service in a backwards-compatible way.
- `break`: Has the potential to break consumers of this service's API, inclusive of both Palantir services
and external consumers of the service's API (e.g. customer-written software or integrations).
- `deprecation`: Advertises the intention to remove service functionality without any change to the
operation of the service itself.
- `manualTask`: Requires the possibility of manual intervention (running a script, eyeballing configuration,
performing database surgery, ...) at the time of upgrade for it to succeed.
- `migration`: A fully automatic upgrade migration task with no engineer input required.
_Note: only one type should be chosen._
How are new versions calculated?
- ❗The `break` and `manual task` changelog types will result in a major release!
- 🐛 The `fix` changelog type will result in a minor release in most cases, and a patch release version for patch branches. This behaviour is configurable in autorelease.
- ✨ All others will result in a minor version release.
General
Before this PR: TimestampRange and BASAI were inside another class. After this PR: These are both going to be persistable types, so I promoted them to their own class for that work. ==COMMIT_MSG== ==COMMIT_MSG==
Priority:
Concerns / possible downsides (what feedback would you like?): Should these versions be persistable? Or should I create Stored* wrappers around them? Seems unnecessary, given that they're usage original was from a stored version, but one could argue that these are views of a stored version (that said, the refactoring to enable that later is simple)