==COMMIT_MSG==
Document current versions.props comment format
==COMMIT_MSG==
This also adds test coverage for the documented comment formats, plus some other comment behaviors that currently exist. I'm not sure the test case in ignores_comment_on_same_line_with_no_hash() is ideal, but supporting that behavior doesn't seem to be hurting much.
What do the change types mean?
- `feature`: A new feature of the service.
- `improvement`: An incremental improvement in the functionality or operation of the service.
- `fix`: Remedies the incorrect behaviour of a component of the service in a backwards-compatible way.
- `break`: Has the potential to break consumers of this service's API, inclusive of both Palantir services
and external consumers of the service's API (e.g. customer-written software or integrations).
- `deprecation`: Advertises the intention to remove service functionality without any change to the
operation of the service itself.
- `manualTask`: Requires the possibility of manual intervention (running a script, eyeballing configuration,
performing database surgery, ...) at the time of upgrade for it to succeed.
- `migration`: A fully automatic upgrade migration task with no engineer input required.
_Note: only one type should be chosen._
How are new versions calculated?
- ❗The `break` and `manual task` changelog types will result in a major release!
- 🐛 The `fix` changelog type will result in a minor release in most cases, and a patch release version for patch branches. This behaviour is configurable in autorelease.
- ✨ All others will result in a minor version release.
Before this PR
Expected
versions.props
comment format is not documented: https://github.com/palantir/gradle-consistent-versions?tab=readme-ov-file#versionsprops-lower-bounds-for-dependenciesAfter this PR
==COMMIT_MSG== Document current
versions.props
comment format ==COMMIT_MSG==This also adds test coverage for the documented comment formats, plus some other comment behaviors that currently exist. I'm not sure the test case in
ignores_comment_on_same_line_with_no_hash()
is ideal, but supporting that behavior doesn't seem to be hurting much.Possible downsides?
None known