Closed NoisyFlowers closed 11 months ago
I know we closed this, but I just wanted to note somewhere that we had an issue raised by a participant that they legacy data they were entering did not designate a holotype, and thus they had trouble entering that field. This makes me wonder if we need to be less strict about requiring a holotype specifically. If we don't require holotype, then this public holotype for a public OTU requirement will have to change to at being at least one public identified specimen.
This is in paleobot/pbot-api@cb1a6a1b37a52c2931371436063b1557279032fe paleobot/pbot-api@c53edb0a09c894592ef883f5ad4c55d516904c70