Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Thanks for the suggestion - I agree with this. Still thinking about the right
way to approach modularity in general, so this may get merged to some other
feature requests for a more general solution.
Original comment by ssade...@gmail.com
on 5 Jul 2012 at 11:39
Original comment by ssade...@gmail.com
on 13 Jul 2012 at 3:16
checked in changes, should be released in 0.9.6
Rather than "include" (which implies the contents of the included file would be
injected into the including one, which is not quite true), we use "load" - but
it comes to the same thing.
Original comment by ssade...@gmail.com
on 13 Jul 2012 at 9:11
checked in changes, should be released in 0.9.6
Rather than "include" (which implies the contents of the included file would be
injected into the including one, which is not quite true), we use "load" - but
it comes to the same thing.
Original comment by ssade...@gmail.com
on 13 Jul 2012 at 9:11
released in 0.9.6_beta_1
Original comment by ssade...@gmail.com
on 5 Aug 2012 at 4:56
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
yanlinlin82
on 17 Jun 2012 at 10:57