Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Thanks for logging this. I agree it's something that needs to be addressed, as
it goes to the issue of reproducibility. I will see what can be done in small
ways to address it in the short term and think about more comprehensive
solutions in the longer term (I am actually thinking the 'bpipe' command itself
might be a part of this in the sense it could be used to query logs for any
stage of any run, such as 'bpipe log <runid> <commandid>, or bpipe log <output
file> (to show the log for command that produced the file), - but that needs
bigger internal changes).
Original comment by ssade...@gmail.com
on 11 Jul 2012 at 11:59
I would like to agree with the initial poster. For reproducibility as well as
traceability and archival purposes a "one log per input" would be quite
essential. I would for example like to integrate these files in our LIMS to
trace the processing an individual file, i.e. a individual samples, has gone
through. Combining that with the version tracker integrated in bpipe would be
quite powerful.
Original comment by NextGen...@gmail.com
on 9 Oct 2012 at 1:21
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
andrew.o...@gmail.com
on 9 Jul 2012 at 9:53