Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Original comment by ssade...@gmail.com
on 12 Jul 2012 at 12:04
Original comment by ssade...@gmail.com
on 12 Jul 2012 at 12:06
Alternatively, it could be a nice feature / solution if Bpipe was automatically
creating a separate directory for each stage of the pipeline it runs (with the
name of the stage as its name). This could improve the transparency / data
provenance (together with solved Issue 2).
Maybe it would disturb something else though - no idea.
Original comment by maciek.k...@gmail.com
on 12 Jul 2012 at 1:49
I was actually trying to have bpipe output results of a pipeline stage in a
sub-directory. This actually doesn't seem possible unless I hard code the
output files. For example, I tried doing something akin to
stage {
produce("outdir/${input}_world.txt", "outdir/${input}_mars.txt") {
exec """cat $input >> $output1"""
exec """cat $input >> $output2"""
}
}
where, actually, I had determined outdir programatically. However, bpipe seems
to be stripping off the output directory and creating the output files directly
in the directory from which it is executed. Is there really no way to tell
bpipe that output files should be placed in a specific directory /
subdirectory? My use-case actually relies fairly heavily on a directory
structure where multiple parts of the pipeline share the same input files but
should output to different sub-directories. Currently, the only way I can see
to do this would be to write a pipeline for every stage that is executed in
that stage's subdirectory --- it seems like this shouldn't be necessary.
Original comment by rob.pa...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2013 at 3:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ssade...@gmail.com
on 12 Jul 2012 at 12:04