Closed JanEricNitschke closed 3 weeks ago
@JanEricNitschke can you address my comments at
I'll then have to take another careful look and see if there is anything else that I'm not comfortable with.
@Dr-Irv ah, sorry, i had other life stuff come up.
I think it is not easily possible to make the changes i intended while keeping with the general philosophy of not disallowing things with the types that do happen to work at runtime.
So i would probably close this PR for now and maybe have another look again later when i have more time to see if there is still an option?
Does that work for you?
So i would probably close this PR for now and maybe have another look again later when i have more time to see if there is still an option?
Does that work for you?
Sure. I'll let you do the closing
assert_type()
to assert the type of any return valueIn my last PR that handles
series.map()
i introduced a slight error by adding the= ...
to the overload with"ignore"
as this is not the actual default value.Subsequently invalid function that do not handle
pd.NA
were accepted when thena_action
was not explicitely specified.This has been addressed and test cases have been added to check this.