search

pandoc / dockerfiles

Dockerfiles for various pandoc images
GNU General Public License v2.0
364 stars 98 forks source link

release=2.14 #143

Closed maehr closed 3 years ago

maehr commented 3 years ago

The new 2.14 release of pandoc hasn't been pushed to https://hackage.haskell.org/package/pandoc. This is why make alpine and make alpine-latex are failing.

PS: 2.13 is still open. See https://github.com/pandoc/dockerfiles/pull/142

alerque commented 3 years ago

Thanks for the contribution, but this isn't true (yet); the current release reflected here is still 2.13. This will only be relevant after we update here to use the new upstream version, which is a little more involved than just bumping the number.

Also see my comment on #142.

maehr commented 3 years ago

Thanks for the contribution, but this isn't true (yet); the current release reflected here is still 2.13. This will only be relevant after we update here to use the new upstream version, which is a little more involved than just bumping the number.

Also see my comment on #214.

Thanks for the remarks and thank you for your work. Tell me if there's anything I can do (and I should tell you that I cannot do Haskell).

alerque commented 3 years ago

There is a release checklist here with the steps that have to work to bump the release here. I think at this point we're waiting for two upstream things to happen:

  1. A hackage release of Pandoc 2.14
  2. A pandoc crossref release that supports 2.14.
maehr commented 3 years ago

Thanks again. PS: Wouldn't it make sense to combine https://github.com/pandoc/dockerfiles#maintenance-notes and https://github.com/pandoc/dockerfiles/wiki/Release-checklist?

svenevs commented 3 years ago

@maehr the maintenance notes on the readme are stale and can be deleted. Good eye, thanks 🙂

alerque commented 3 years ago

Thanks for the contribution. This will be the first time I've pulled the final release trigger. I think the CI job should pick it up from here and push the right tags to Docker, but lets stand by to see if that works.

alerque commented 3 years ago

Hey @maehr sorry to bother you but can we get you do drop a note or review approval on #101 allowing your contributions to be used under GPL2+ (same license terms as Pandoc) instead of just GPL2?

maehr commented 3 years ago

Hey @maehr sorry to bother you but can we get you do drop a note or review approval on #101 allowing your contributions to be used under GPL2+ (same license terms as Pandoc) instead of just GPL2?

Of course I approve to GPL2+.